The magical pretensions Roger Bacon ridiculed

Which magical pretensions did Roger Bacon ridicule, and why?

Roger Bacon was a medieval English philosopher and Franciscan friar who was critical of many of the magical pretensions of his time. He lived in the 13th century and is considered one of the early pioneers of the scientific method.

Bacon was particularly critical of the claims made by alchemists and astrologers. He ridiculed their attempts to turn base metals into gold, which he believed to be impossible. He also criticized astrologers for their belief that the position of the stars and planets could determine human destiny.

Bacon argued that such magical beliefs were not based on empirical evidence or reason, but rather on superstition and speculation. He believed that knowledge should be based on observation and experimentation, and that claims about the natural world should be subject to rigorous testing.

Bacon's criticisms of magical pretensions were motivated by his desire to promote a more rational and scientific approach to understanding the world. He believed that by relying on reason and evidence, humans could unlock the secrets of nature and make important advances in fields such as medicine, astronomy, and chemistry.
----------------
Is there any evidence to suggest that he participated in the things he outwardly criticised?

There is no evidence to suggest that Roger Bacon participated in the very things he criticized. In fact, his writings and teachings consistently emphasized the importance of empirical observation, experimentation, and rational inquiry.

Bacon was critical of many of the popular beliefs and practices of his time, including alchemy and astrology, which he believed were not based on sound reasoning or empirical evidence. He argued that such practices were often based on superstition and speculation rather than a systematic and rational approach to understanding the natural world.

Instead, Bacon advocated for a more rigorous approach to learning, based on observation and experimentation. He emphasized the importance of using instruments and tools to collect data, and believed that knowledge should be based on empirical evidence, rather than speculation or hearsay.

Bacon's approach to learning and his commitment to empirical observation were part of a larger movement towards scientific inquiry in the Middle Ages, and his ideas helped to pave the way for the scientific revolution that would occur several centuries later.
------------------
How do you align this with the fact that he was a devout Christian?

Roger Bacon's devout Christian faith was not incompatible with his scientific pursuits and critical attitude towards certain traditional beliefs and practices. In fact, many medieval scholars believed that the study of the natural world was a way to better understand God's creation and to appreciate the divine order of the universe.

Bacon himself believed that the study of nature was a way to gain a deeper understanding of God's wisdom and to appreciate the beauty of the natural world. He argued that the pursuit of knowledge was not only compatible with faith, but was in fact an essential part of the Christian life.

At the same time, Bacon recognized that some traditional beliefs and practices could be based on superstition and ignorance, rather than reason and evidence. He believed that a critical and rational approach to learning was necessary in order to separate truth from error, and to gain a more accurate understanding of the natural world.

Bacon's commitment to empirical observation and his emphasis on rational inquiry were not in conflict with his faith, but were rather a reflection of his belief that the study of nature was an important way to deepen one's understanding of God's creation.
---------------